Cash Value Life Insurance for Retirement Income in Canada

Introduction

Permanent life insurance accumulates value that the owner can access during life. For someone approaching retirement with a substantial policy, the question of how to draw on it becomes a practical one.

The answer is less straightforward than most retirement income questions, because the routes available carry materially different tax consequences and different risks.

It is also worth separating two situations. An owner who already holds a well funded policy is deciding how best to use an existing asset. Someone considering purchasing a policy for this purpose is making a different decision entirely, and a harder one to justify.

The Routes Available

An owner can access policy value in several ways, and the differences matter more than the similarities:

• A full surrender, ending the policy and taking the proceeds
• Partial withdrawals taken periodically from the cash value
• Policy loans from the insurer against the policy
• A collateral loan from a bank with the policy assigned as security
• Converting the policy to an annuity under a settlement option

Each produces a different taxable amount for the same capital accessed, and the gap between the best and worst route for a given situation is often substantial.

Surrender and Withdrawals

A surrender is the simplest route and usually the worst.

It ends the coverage, produces a taxable amount measured by the excess of proceeds over the cost basis of the policy, and concentrates that amount in a single year. For a long held policy with a low cost basis, the result can be a large inclusion at a point when the owner has little capacity to absorb it.

Partial withdrawals spread the exposure across years, which helps. But they carry a feature owners rarely appreciate: only a proportionate share of the cost basis is applied against each withdrawal, rather than the full amount.

That proration means withdrawals generally produce more taxable income than a policy loan of the same size, which is the reverse of what most owners assume.

Borrowing Against the Policy

Borrowing is where the arrangement becomes more favourable and more complicated.

A policy loan from the insurer is treated as a disposition, but the full cost basis is applied against it rather than a prorated share. For the same amount of capital, it generally produces a smaller taxable amount than a withdrawal.

A collateral loan from a third party lender is not treated as a disposition at all, so no taxable amount arises at the time of borrowing. This is the structure behind arrangements marketed as insured retirement plans.

The collateral route produces the best tax outcome and introduces the most risk. It depends on a lender continuing to lend for decades, on policy performance meeting assumptions, and on interest rates remaining tolerable while the loan balance compounds.

If that arrangement fails and the policy has to be surrendered to repay the loan, the taxable amount arrives at the worst possible moment.

The Income Testing Advantage

One feature of this strategy is genuinely distinctive in a retirement context and deserves more attention than it gets.

Growth inside the policy is not income while the policy stays within the tax rules. It therefore does not add to the owner’s income for the purposes of income tested government benefits.

For a retiree whose income sits near the threshold at which Old Age Security begins to be clawed back, this matters. Investment income from a non-registered portfolio counts toward that threshold. Accumulation inside a policy does not.

Borrowing against the policy also does not generate income for this purpose, which is part of why the collateral route appears in retirement planning.

A surrender or a withdrawal is different, because those produce an income inclusion that can affect benefit entitlement in the year taken.

Sequencing With Other Income Sources

Policy value should be considered alongside the rest of the retirement picture rather than in isolation.

Registered income is taxable when withdrawn and is subject to minimum withdrawal requirements once converted. Tax-free savings account withdrawals are neither taxable nor income tested. Non-registered portfolios produce ongoing taxable income regardless of whether anything is withdrawn.

Policy value is more flexible than most of these, because the timing is entirely at the owner’s discretion and some routes produce no income at all.

That flexibility is most valuable as a buffer. Drawing on the policy in a year when other income is unusually high, or when an unexpected need arises, avoids pushing other income into a higher bracket or across a benefit threshold.

Using it as the primary income source is a different proposition and a weaker one.

The Trade-Off Against the Death Benefit

Every dollar drawn from the policy during life reduces what remains at death.

This is obvious when stated and routinely glossed over in illustrations, which sometimes present substantial retirement income and a substantial death benefit as though both will be delivered in full.

Where the policy was purchased to fund a tax liability at death, or to equalize between beneficiaries, drawing on it during retirement undermines the purpose it was bought for.

The two objectives compete. An owner should be clear about which one the policy is primarily serving, and should revisit that decision if circumstances change.

Buying a Policy for This Purpose

For someone considering a purchase rather than deciding how to use an existing policy, the analysis is less favourable.

Registered room should be used first. Registered plans provide tax advantaged accumulation without insurance costs, without lender dependency, and without a compounding loan balance.

Cash value in the early years of a policy sits well below the amount contributed, and the accumulation requires a horizon measured in decades to overcome that.

The arrangement is defensible as a supplementary strategy for someone who has exhausted registered room, has surplus cash flow beyond that, and independently needs permanent life insurance.

Where the insurance need is absent, the owner is paying the cost of coverage they do not require in order to obtain an accumulation feature, which is rarely a good trade.

Confirming the Position Before Drawing

Whatever route is chosen, the cost basis of the policy drives the outcome and it is not the total of premiums paid.

It is maintained by the insurer and should be requested in writing as at the intended transaction date. It declines in the later years of a policy, which is precisely when retirement draws begin.

With that figure in hand, the routes can be compared for the same amount of capital. The comparison usually takes little time once the number is available, and it frequently changes the decision.

Common Planning Mistakes

Several errors recur.

Surrendering a policy outright when partial access would have met the need at far lower tax cost.

Choosing withdrawals over policy loans because the paperwork looks simpler, without comparing the taxable amounts.

Treating a collateral loan arrangement as risk free because the tax outcome is favourable.

Drawing down a policy that was purchased to fund a liability at death, without revisiting that plan.

Purchasing a policy for retirement income while registered room remains unused.

Conclusion

Cash value life insurance can contribute to retirement income, and the route chosen determines how much tax is paid on the same capital.

Surrenders and withdrawals produce the largest taxable amounts, policy loans generally produce less because the full cost basis is applied, and collateral borrowing from a third party lender produces none at the time of borrowing while carrying the most risk.

Accumulation inside the policy is not income for the purpose of income tested benefits, which makes it useful as a buffer alongside other retirement income rather than as the primary source.

Everything drawn during life reduces what remains at death, so the competing objectives should be settled rather than assumed to be compatible.

For an owner who already holds a well funded policy, this is a question of using an existing asset well. For someone considering a purchase for this purpose, registered room should be used first and a genuine insurance need should exist independently.

Tax Partners can assist you in structuring your affairs properly and ensuring full compliance while optimizing your tax position.

This article is written for educational purposes.
 

Should you have any inquiries, please do not hesitate to contact us at (905) 836-8755, via email at info@taxpartners.ca, or by visiting our website at www.taxpartners.ca.
 

Tax Partners has been operational since 1981 and is recognized as one of the leading tax and accounting firms in North America. Contact us today for a FREE initial consultation appointment.